By Professor Stephen R. Anderson

Dr. Dolittle—and many scholars of animal communication—are flawed: animals can't use language. This attention-grabbing booklet explains why. Can animals study a human language and use it to speak? Or is human language precise to humans, simply as many complicated behaviors of alternative species are uniquely theirs? This engrossing booklet explores conversation and cognition in animals and people from a linguistic perspective and asserts that animals will not be able to buying or utilizing human language.Stephen R. Anderson explains what's intended by way of conversation, the variation among conversation and language, and the fundamental features of language. subsequent he examines quite a few animal verbal exchange platforms, together with bee dances, frog vocalizations, poultry songs, and alarm calls and different vocal, gestural, and olfactory communique between primates. Anderson then compares those to human language, together with signed languages utilized by the deaf. Arguing that makes an attempt to educate human languages or their equivalents to the good apes haven't succeeded in demonstrating linguistic skills in nonhuman species, he concludes that animal conversation systems—intriguing and sundry even though they might be—do now not comprise all of the crucial houses of human language. Animals can speak, yet they can’t speak. Stephen R. Anderson is professor of linguistics, psychology, and cognitive technological know-how at Yale collage.

Show description

Read or Download Doctor Dolittle's Delusion: Animals and the Uniqueness of Human Language PDF

Best zoology books

Zoology in Early Modern Culture: Intersections of Science, Theology, Philology, and Political and Religious Education (Intersections: Interdisciplinary Studies in Early Modern Culture, Volume 32)

This quantity attempts to map out the exciting amalgam of alternative, partially conflicting methods that formed early sleek zoology. It demonstrates that theology and philology performed a pivotal function within the advanced formation of this new technology.

Peacemaking among Primates

Does biology condemn the human species to violence and conflict? earlier experiences of animal habit incline us to reply to certain, however the message of this publication is significantly extra positive. with no denying our historical past of competitive habit, Frans de Waal describes robust exams and balances within the make-up of our closest animal family, and in so doing he exhibits that to people making peace is as typical as making warfare.

Additional resources for Doctor Dolittle's Delusion: Animals and the Uniqueness of Human Language

Sample text

In this way the modalities of natural languages (both spoken and signed) differ from those of chemical or olfactory signals, or from outwardly visible physical changes that communicate one animal’s internal state to another. 10 08:38 Competent language users both produce and comprehend the same range of signals, at least under normal conditions and barring pathology (such as deafness or blindness). In this respect human language is different from some other systems. Birdsong, for instance, is typically produced by the W 23 X 7067 Anderson / DOCTOR DOLITTLE’S DELUSION / sheet 36 of 367 Language and Communication male and not by the female (although there are species in which both sexes sing) and comprehended by male and female (but in different ways).

If we ignore the point that the bees themselves may not be infinitely precise in producing and interpreting these dances, there can thus be an infinite number of dances. This kind of productivity is completely different from what we find in human language. Even on the most charitable interpretation, the bees are always ‘‘talking about’’ the same thing (however many subtly distinct variants there may be), whereas the variety of things humans can refer to when talking is not limited in that way. This difference in the productivity of communication systems requires us to distinguish continuous openness—as illustrated by bee dances—and discrete openness of the sort we find in natural language.

And the way he knew what answers to give was from the signals that Blossom gave to him secretly. When he wanted Nino to say yes, the ringmaster would scratch his left ear; when he wanted him to say no, he would fold his arms, and so on. The secret of all these signals Blossom kept jealously to himself. 10 08:38 On Studying Cognition about them because Nino had told him how the whole performance was carried on. . ‘‘Look here, Mr. Blossom,’’ said [Doctor Dolittle] quietly, . . ‘‘I know a good deal more about animals than you suppose I do.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.66 of 5 – based on 39 votes